Evaluation of Curriculum Implementation in Nigeria Universities – A Feasibility Study

Authors

  • John N. Nwosu Department of Computer Science Federal Polytechnic, Oko Anambra State, Nigeria
  • Gabriel N. Odachi Department of Computer Education Nwafor Orizu College of Education, Nsugbe Anambra State, Nigeria

Keywords:

Curriculum,, learning,, evaluation and lecture material.

Abstract

This research investigated the use of lecture material by students in the preparation of lectures and examination. The instigation includes determining if departmental handbook which contains the curriculum that students in the department are to offer before their graduation are made available to students at the point of their registration in the department. It also includes determining if there is a need to evaluate lecture materials given by lecturers to students to know if it compliances with minimum benchmark established by National University Commission (NUC). The research involved administering structured questionnaire to 200 students selected randomly from University of Nigeria, Nsukka and Chukwuemeka Odimegwu Ojukwu University, Uli to elicit response on the use of lecture materials. Chi square was used to analyze the data collected from the respondents. The mean of the nominal value is equal to 2.5 at 0.005 level of confidence and 12 degree of freedom. The calculated x2 of 207.6 exceeds the x2 critical value of 21.0. This shows that students use lecture material in the preparation of lectures and examination. The result also shows that students are aware of departmental handbook which was developed in line with NUC curriculum. Also the research reveals that there is a need to evaluate the lecture materials given to students to know it it compliance with NUC minimum benchmark.

References

Bligh, D. (2000). What's the use of lectures? http://books.google.co.uk/books.about pg. 15 Retrived on 12 March 2014.

Frean, A. (2008). Forget memorizing. The Ottawa Citizen, Sunday, December 21, 2008, p. B2

Garrote, R. & Pettersson, T. (2007). Lecturers’ attitudes about the use of learning management systems in engineering education: A Swedish case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(3), pp327-349.

Levensaler, L., and Laurano, M (2009). Talent Management Systems 2010, Bersin & Associates

Lucas, G. (2005). George Lucas Education Foundation. http://www.edutopia.org/assessment-guide-description. Retrived on 13th March 2014.

Szabo, M and Flesher, K. (2002). CMI Theory and Practice: Historical Roots of Learning Management Systems. Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2002 (White Paper) (Montreal, Canada: In M. Driscoll & T. Reeves (Eds.)): pp. 929–936. ISBN 1-880094-46-0

Watson, W.R. (2007). An Argument for Clarity: What are Learning Management Systems, What are They Not, and What Should They Become?. TechTrends 51 (2): 28–34. Retrieved 13 February 2013.

Wiggins, G. (2015). Relearning by Design. New Jersey: Ewing.

Wilson, M and Scalise, K (2006). Assessment to Improve Learning in Higher Education: The BEAR Assessment System. Higher Education, 52: pp 635-663.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-08

How to Cite

Nwosu , J. N., & Odachi , G. N. (2017). Evaluation of Curriculum Implementation in Nigeria Universities – A Feasibility Study . African Journal of Education,Science and Technology (AJEST), 3(3), pp 175–182. Retrieved from http://ajest.org/index.php/ajest/article/view/580

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.