Response of Four Varieties of Courgettes (Cucurbita pepo) to Powdery Mildew (Sphaerotheca fuliginiea) Disease
Keywords:
Powdery Mildew,, Sphaerotheca fuliginiea,, Response,, Cucurbita pepoAbstract
Courgettes are known to be good source of Potassium, an important intra-cellular electrolyte that helps in reducing blood pressure problems. Powdery mildew disease has become a stumbling block to yield, quality and production of Courgettes in both greenhouse and field production. A study was conducted to screen different varieties of Courgettes; Hybrid Squash STAR 8021, Hybrid Squash Ambassador, Dark Green Zucchini, Squash Black Beauty against powdery mildew inoculum. This was carried out at the School of Agriculture and Biotechnology – University of Eldoret, greenhouse and laboratory where four varieties of were planted in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with 3 replicates each. Fresh Diseased plant materials were then collected from CHEPFRESH and isolated to obtain inoculums by scraping the conidia of a virulent isolate into sterilized distilled water. Courgettes in the greenhouse were then transferred to the laboratory at stage of 16th day after germination for inoculation. Inoculation was done by spraying using a hand sprayer until run-off. There was no use of chemicals in the management of the disease. Data was collected on height of plant at intervals of 1 week, number of fruits per plant, days to flowering and disease severity rated at 0-5 rating scale 8 days after inoculation. The quantitative data collected was subjected to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) using Genstat Version 14.1 and means separated using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. From the results there was a difference between the four varieties on their response to disease where Hybrid Squash STAR 8021 (highly susceptible), Hybrid Squash Ambassador (susceptible), Dark Green Zucchini (resistant), Squash Black Beauty (moderately susceptible). On number of fruits, Hybrid Squash STAR 8021 had the highest mean (8.250) and Dark Green Zucchini with the lowest mean (3.750).
References
Agrios G. (2005) plant disease caused by fungi. In: Plant pathology.pp.385-614. San Diego, California, USA: Academic press Inc.
Agrios, G.N., 1969. Plant Pathology. 629pp. Academic Press. New York.
Agrios, G.N. (1997).Plant Pathology. 4th ed. Academic Press
Butt, D.J., 1978. Epidemiology of powdery mildews Pp 51-81. In: The Powdery Mildews. D.M. Spencer (Ed), Academic Press, London.
Crisp P, Bruer D 2001. Organic control of powdery mildew without sulfur.Australian Grapegrower and Winemaker 452: 22
Dixon, G.R., 1981. Vegetable Crop Diseases. 404pp. Macmillan Publishers Ltd. Hong Kong.
Dutin & Sokolov, 1978, U.V.1978. Identification of powdery mildew species on cucurbit crops using conidia. Breeding and technology: Irrigation of melon crops: pp.11-14. All Russian Sci.Res.Inst.of vegetables and melon crops, Astrakhan(In Russian)
Hashioka, Y., 1937. Relation of temperature and humidity to Sphaerotheca fuliginea (Schlecht) Poll, with special reference to germination, viability, and infection. Rev. Appl. Mycol. 17: 93-94.
Jihha, O.H. (1973). Plant Pathology. P(63-64)
Uozumi, T. And Yoshii, H., 1952. Some observations on the mildew fungus affecting Cucurbitaceousplants. Ann. Phytopath. Soc. Japan 16: 123-126.
Manners, J.G. and Hossain, S.M.M., 1963. Effects of temperature and humidity on conidia germination in Erysiphe cichoracearum. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 46: 225-234.
Singh, R.S (1983). Plant Diseases. 5th ed.(P.229
Stone, O.M. (1962). Alternative host of cucumber powdery mildew. Ann.App.Biol.50:203-210