The Cost Elements of Mentoring to the Student Teacher: The Moderating Role of Mentees’ Gender and the Location of Schools of Attachment
Keywords:
Cost Element;, Location of School of Attachment;, Mentee’s Gender;, Moderating Role of Gender and Student Teacher MentoringAbstract
This study examined the moderating role of gender of mentees and the location of schools of
attachment and its impact on the cost of the mentoring process. The cross-sectional and
descriptive survey designs were blended to address the stated objectives along with the
quantitative approach. Structured questionnaire was used to collect data from 810 mentees
(477 males and 333 females) for the analyses. Frequencies, percentages, two-way ANOVA
and predictive margins were used for the analyses. The major cost areas identified were
accommodation, feeding, utility bills, transportation and stationery. Generally, the results
indicated that, with exception of utility (electricity and water), gender and location
individually explained the magnitude of the cost of the mentoring programme on the mentees
but their joint effect did not. Specifically, more mentees in the urban areas irrespective of
gender spent more on accommodation than mentees in the rural areas. Nonetheless, males
in the urban areas spent more on accommodation than females in the urban areas and
females in both the rural and urban areas spent more on utility bills and feeding than the
male mentees. It was also observed that location of school of attachment did not
significantly influence the payment of utility bills. The study concluded that with exception of accommodation and stationery; the female mentees felt the cost of the mentoring process in
the areas of utility and feeding than the males. The study recommended that: the government
pays special allowance to the student teachers during the mentoring session but the females’
package should be higher than the males and the school authorities should provide decent
accommodation for all mentees posted to their schools.
References
Ahmad, S. S. (2015). Rural Urban Food Consumption Analysis in Pakistan: Expenditure Elasticities Approach.
Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences 2015, Vol. 9 (1), 159-170
Bozeman, B., & Feeney, M. K. (2007). Toward a useful theory of mentoring: A conceptual analysis and critique.
Administration & Society, 39(6), 719-739. doi:10.1177/0095 399 707304119
Crumpton, M. A. (2014). Can a mentoring program save you money? The Bottom Line.
Eduful, A, K. & Hooper, M. (2019), Urban migration and housing during resource booms: The case of SekondiTakoradi. Ghana Habitat International, 93(4), 3-9.
Fouka, G. & Mantzorou, M. (2011). What are the major ethical issues in conducting research? Is there a conflict
between the research ethics and the nature of nursing? Health Science Journal, 5(3), 3-14.
Garau, C. (2015). Perspectives on cultural and sustainable rural tourism in a smart region: The case study of
Marmilla in Sardinia (Italy). Sustainability, 7(6), 6412-6434. Ghana Statistical Service (2014). 2010
Population and housing census reports urbanisation. Republic of Ghana. Retrieved from:
https://statsghana.gov.gh/gssmain/ fileUpload/pressrelease/Urbanisation Ghana.pdf
Kaewkungwal, J., & Adams, P. (2019). Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent
process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand, Accountability in
Research, 26(3), 176-197.
Lancaster G., Maitra P., & Ray R., (2008). Household expenditure patterns and gender bias: evidence from selected
Indian States, Oxford Development Studies, vol. 36, no. 2, 133–157.
Latham, G. I., & Fifield, K. (1993). The hidden costs of teaching. Educational Leadership, 1, 44-45.
Maharana B, Ladusingh L. (2014). Gender Disparity in Health and Food Expenditure in India among Elderly.
International Journal of Population Research. Volume 2014,1-8
Marshall J., & Bollman D. R (1999). Rural and Small-Town Canada Analysis Bulletin Catalogue no. 21-006-XIE
Vol. 1, No. 4
Namdeo, S. K., & Rout, S. D. (2016). Calculating and interpreting Cronbach’s alpha using Rosenberg assessment
scale on paediatrician’s attitude and perception on self-esteem. International Journal of Community Medicine and
Public Health, 3(6), 1371-1374.
Neuman, S. P. (2003). Maximum likelihood Bayesian averaging of uncertain model predictions. Stochastic
Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 17(5), 291-305.
Obayelu A. E., Okoruwa V. O. & Ajani O. I. Y. (2011). Analysis of differences in rural- urban households’ food
expenditure share in Kwara and Kogi States of Nigeria. Global Journal of Agricultural Sciences Vol 10, No. 1, 1-18
Pateman T. (2011). Rural and urban areas: comparing lives using rural/urban classifications, Regional Trends 43.
Public Utility Regulatory Commission [PURC], (2018). Rate setting guideline for electricity distribution and
supply. Retrieved form: https://www.purc.com.gh/ attachment/ 438 724-20201119 111122.pdf
Rhodes, J.E., & DuBois, D.L. (2006). Understanding and facilitating the youth mentoring movement. Social Policy
Report,20(3), 3–20.
Saunders, M. N., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A., & Bristow, A. (2015). Understanding research philosophy and
approaches to theory development. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Simon, S. and Wardlow, G. (1989). The perceptions of beginning teachers aboutthe value of mentors. Proceedings
of the 43rd Annual Central RegionResearch Conference in Agricultural Education.T-TEL (2016). Schools
Partnership Programme. Year 3: Teaching Practice (Mentor Handbook). Published
by the Ministry of Education (Ghana), under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.
Available online at http://www.t-tel.org. Version 1.0.
Villar, A., & Strong, M. (2010). Is mentoring worth the money? A benefit-cost analysis and five-year rate of return
of a comprehensive mentoring program for beginning teachers. Ers Spectrum, 25(3), 1-17.
